<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Problem Part 2 &#8211; The Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/</link>
	<description>Building Successful Internet Businesses!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:13:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conray Knox</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Conray Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Complicated answer.  I had to read it a couple of times to understand it.  I do have one question. 

Do you know which keywords converted to sales?

Conray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complicated answer.  I had to read it a couple of times to understand it.  I do have one question. </p>
<p>Do you know which keywords converted to sales?</p>
<p>Conray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas K.</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Socrates...

You&#039;re a blessing.

By-the-by... how goes
the new version of MyDD?

TK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socrates&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a blessing.</p>
<p>By-the-by&#8230; how goes<br />
the new version of MyDD?</p>
<p>TK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Now my question to your answer is this.  If you drop the other ad will your sales increase to equal or exceed the total sales you have between the two?  Without seeing the ads it maybe that the two different ads may be causeing different responses it two different groups.  For example those clicking on ad 1 may not click on ad #2 and vise versa.  It will be interesting to see what happends to sales after dropping one of the ads.  It would also be interested to know what the response was to any optin list endeavors taken and the sales accomplished from those lists after repeated exposure to the products/services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now my question to your answer is this.  If you drop the other ad will your sales increase to equal or exceed the total sales you have between the two?  Without seeing the ads it maybe that the two different ads may be causeing different responses it two different groups.  For example those clicking on ad 1 may not click on ad #2 and vise versa.  It will be interesting to see what happends to sales after dropping one of the ads.  It would also be interested to know what the response was to any optin list endeavors taken and the sales accomplished from those lists after repeated exposure to the products/services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graphic</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>: )This is just an equation, an ability to meet the challenge of filling any space required in explaining small and great detail to those : )
that have at this time, become very confused and
lost in the complex detail about the simple marketing tools, calculations, excitement and ease of gaining sales in any market. phewww!

I think I&#039;ll be a chef!  : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>: )This is just an equation, an ability to meet the challenge of filling any space required in explaining small and great detail to those : )<br />
that have at this time, become very confused and<br />
lost in the complex detail about the simple marketing tools, calculations, excitement and ease of gaining sales in any market. phewww!</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ll be a chef!  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Hi Socrates,

Thank you very  much for the great question and answer to the question.  You explained everything very well.

I prefer to eliminate the people that are just looking if at all possible without having them click on my ad for nothing.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Socrates,</p>
<p>Thank you very  much for the great question and answer to the question.  You explained everything very well.</p>
<p>I prefer to eliminate the people that are just looking if at all possible without having them click on my ad for nothing.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gravytrains</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Gravytrains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>WoW!

I wonder if everyone can get their head around this explanation.
I had no idea marketing was going to require &quot;rocket science&quot;
This is definately for the &quot;hard core&quot; types
Personally, I&#039;ll just keep it simple and maybe buy a service that calculates these things for me if I really think I need it.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WoW!</p>
<p>I wonder if everyone can get their head around this explanation.<br />
I had no idea marketing was going to require &#8220;rocket science&#8221;<br />
This is definately for the &#8220;hard core&#8221; types<br />
Personally, I&#8217;ll just keep it simple and maybe buy a service that calculates these things for me if I really think I need it.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Galbraith</title>
		<link>http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Galbraith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://SocratesBlog.com/68/google-problem-part-2-the-analysis/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>Socrates:

Interesting you would mention tennis.  It is historically my favorite sport.  My 
grandfather, Richard (Dick) Skeen was U.S. Champion in 1941 (before the open era 
of tennis began); was ranked #2 in the world in 1939 (behind Don Budge) and 
played with and beat the top players of that era (Budge, Vines, Tilden, Riggs, 
Richards and the best of the German players who were very good).  He played 
Davis Cup, Wimbleton and the low paying circuit that it was in those years 
(mostly smaller tournaments pitting the top players week in and week out).  My 
grandfather beat Bobby Riggs in Bobby&#039;s first &quot;professional&quot; tournament in San 
Fransisco (semi-finals-6-0 &amp; 6-0), in 1939.  He played doubles with Vince 
Richards (another US champ) and often played doubles with Vines and others in 
tournaments throughout Europe, prior to the war years.  Once World War II began 
all the best in the world played a repeateing loop circuit in the U.S., Mexico, 
Canada and South America.  In 1933 my grandfather (my fami
ly lived in Hollywood, CA, my birthplace too) started a tennis academy for young prodigies.  
My grandfather developed Jack Kramer from ages 12-15 (Kramer won the US 18&#039;s at 
age 15), and of the first 13 kids in his first academy 12 went on to become 
National champions and three became world champions (including Louise Brough).  
Oh, the 13th kid and only non-champion, oh he became a professor at the Stanford 
University Law School (as my grandfather once said to me, &quot;my only 
dissappointment was that kid who became a law professor&quot;).  In his later years he 
played the seniors circuit winning over 50 titles.  I have his original Davis 
Cup racket and his US open rackets.  Life magazine did a special feature on my 
grandfather in the February 1964 edition.  Before any of his green kids touched 
a tennis racket they learned chess (for three months, four days per week, three 
hours per day).  Why?  To learn strategy;  always thinking four shots ahead so 
they would be in the right position to str
ike.  He wrote a book in 1972 entitled, &quot;tennis champions are made, not born.&quot;  His teaching accomplishments bore the 
truth.  Though impressed with Bjorn Borg and Jimmy Conners he felt players like 
Pancho Segura and Poncho Gonzales, Bill Trabert, Kramer and others would have 
held there own against today&#039;s best, not from power, but from pin-point shots 
and net play.  So, yeah, tennis is my game (I was actually an All-American in 
track, not tennis, in college).

Strategy in growing an on-line business is the same.  Study one&#039;s opponent (or 
in this case on-line retailing and see what works best);  keep one&#039;s nose to the 
grindstone, practice, practice, practice, experiment and if that fails, try some 
other stroke, Ad, formula, whatever, and mostly do it from the heart and have 
fun.  Having fun is the key ingredient to success.

Blessings to you and enjoy your tennis,


Steve Galbraith (my mothers&#039; maiden name was Skeen)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Socrates:</p>
<p>Interesting you would mention tennis.  It is historically my favorite sport.  My<br />
grandfather, Richard (Dick) Skeen was U.S. Champion in 1941 (before the open era<br />
of tennis began); was ranked #2 in the world in 1939 (behind Don Budge) and<br />
played with and beat the top players of that era (Budge, Vines, Tilden, Riggs,<br />
Richards and the best of the German players who were very good).  He played<br />
Davis Cup, Wimbleton and the low paying circuit that it was in those years<br />
(mostly smaller tournaments pitting the top players week in and week out).  My<br />
grandfather beat Bobby Riggs in Bobby&#8217;s first &#8220;professional&#8221; tournament in San<br />
Fransisco (semi-finals-6-0 &amp; 6-0), in 1939.  He played doubles with Vince<br />
Richards (another US champ) and often played doubles with Vines and others in<br />
tournaments throughout Europe, prior to the war years.  Once World War II began<br />
all the best in the world played a repeateing loop circuit in the U.S., Mexico,<br />
Canada and South America.  In 1933 my grandfather (my fami<br />
ly lived in Hollywood, CA, my birthplace too) started a tennis academy for young prodigies.<br />
My grandfather developed Jack Kramer from ages 12-15 (Kramer won the US 18&#8217;s at<br />
age 15), and of the first 13 kids in his first academy 12 went on to become<br />
National champions and three became world champions (including Louise Brough).<br />
Oh, the 13th kid and only non-champion, oh he became a professor at the Stanford<br />
University Law School (as my grandfather once said to me, &#8220;my only<br />
dissappointment was that kid who became a law professor&#8221;).  In his later years he<br />
played the seniors circuit winning over 50 titles.  I have his original Davis<br />
Cup racket and his US open rackets.  Life magazine did a special feature on my<br />
grandfather in the February 1964 edition.  Before any of his green kids touched<br />
a tennis racket they learned chess (for three months, four days per week, three<br />
hours per day).  Why?  To learn strategy;  always thinking four shots ahead so<br />
they would be in the right position to str<br />
ike.  He wrote a book in 1972 entitled, &#8220;tennis champions are made, not born.&#8221;  His teaching accomplishments bore the<br />
truth.  Though impressed with Bjorn Borg and Jimmy Conners he felt players like<br />
Pancho Segura and Poncho Gonzales, Bill Trabert, Kramer and others would have<br />
held there own against today&#8217;s best, not from power, but from pin-point shots<br />
and net play.  So, yeah, tennis is my game (I was actually an All-American in<br />
track, not tennis, in college).</p>
<p>Strategy in growing an on-line business is the same.  Study one&#8217;s opponent (or<br />
in this case on-line retailing and see what works best);  keep one&#8217;s nose to the<br />
grindstone, practice, practice, practice, experiment and if that fails, try some<br />
other stroke, Ad, formula, whatever, and mostly do it from the heart and have<br />
fun.  Having fun is the key ingredient to success.</p>
<p>Blessings to you and enjoy your tennis,</p>
<p>Steve Galbraith (my mothers&#8217; maiden name was Skeen)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

